Skip to content
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Ginsberg Law Offices

Atlanta Bankruptcy Attorneys

ARE YOU LOOKING FOR PEACE OF MIND? Start Here

  • Home
  • FAQ
  • Just Starting
  • Ready to File
  • Blog
  • About Us
  • Contact

Credit Card Company Loses a Discharge Action

By Jonathan on May 15, 2006

My friend, attorney Howard Rothbloom, recently emailed me about his victory over MBNA in a discharge complaint filed against his client. In the MBNA vs. Horrocks case, the debtor had charged over $2,400 on his MBNA credit card less than one month prior to filing Chapter 7 bankruptcy.

MBNA’s lawyers filed an Adversary Complaint against Mr. Horrocks alleging (1) that he committed “actual fraud” pursuant to Bankruptcy Code Section 523(a)(2) and (2) that these charges were made within the 60 day “presumption of non-dischargeability period” set out at Section 523(a)(2)(C). Howard smartly noted, however, that the Complaint filed by MBNA was lacking in detail. It contained a number of allegations, but offered no proof.

Howard challenged MBNA by filing discovery materials including requests for admissions, which MBNA failed to answer. When a party fails to answer requests for admissions, those admissions are deemed “admitted.” Further, Howard cited a Northern District of Georiga case which held that “actual fraud” means more than using the credit card. The creditor must present evidence showing that the debtor had actual, subjective fraudulent intent. It appears that MBNA and its counsel felt that they could win simply on the fact that the debtor used his credit card shortly before filing. And, more likely than not, if they had made the effort, they very well might have won. But Judge Bonapfel sent a message to MBNA and other creditors – creditors need to produce evidence to prove their cases. Congratulations to Howard for holding the line, especially in light of the many anti-debtor provisions of the new law.

UPDATE: Attorney Susan Gantt recently emailed to update me that Judge Bonapfel has issued his order awarding debtor’s counsel Howard Rothbloom over $3,000 in attorney’s fees pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 9011. Because creditor’s counsel failed to respond to the debtor’s discovery motions or his motion for summary judgment, the Bankruptcy Code requires that the Court impose sanctions against the creditor (MBNA) and its local counsel.

Primary Sidebar

Search Our Site

Ginsberg

Susan Blum and Jonathan Ginsberg

Ginsberg Law Offices
1854 Independence Square
Atlanta, Georgia 30338-5174

P: 770-393-4985
F: 770-393-0240
E: atlantabankruptcy@gmail.com

Contact Us

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

RSS From Our Blog

  • Using Chapter 13 to Stop a Home Foreclosure
  • Median Income Numbers for 2025 Filings Now Available
  • Has the Atlanta Bankruptcy World Returned to “Normal” in 2023?
  • Should You File Bankruptcy During the Coronavirus Pandemic?

Jonathan’s Ratings

10.0Jonathan C. Ginsberg Jonathan C. GinsbergClients’ ChoiceAward 2019 Jonathan C. GinsbergReviewsout of 66 reviews

Susan’s Ratings

Susan Schmeidler BlumReviewsout of 111 reviews Susan Schmeidler BlumClients’ ChoiceAward 2019 10.0Susan Schmeidler Blum

Visit our YouTube Channel

Start with our Two Page Questionnaire

Click Here

  • Chapter 7 vs. Chapter 13
  • Alternatives to Bankruptcy?
  • Will I Lose my Property if I File?
  • How Much Does it Cost?

Copyright © 2026 · Smart Passive Income Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in